<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Don't Forget Tony</title>
		<description>Comments for Don't Forget Tony at http://18to88.com , comment 1 to 32 out of 20 comments</description>
		<link>http://18to88.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:40:48 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Holy Strombolis!</title>
			<link>http://18to88.com/2009-archives/august/dont-forget-tony.html#comment-454</link>
			<description>What the hell was that NPM guy even talking about? I mean &quot;shut the f**k up&quot; about what? That was about as mystifying as someone driving by a synagogue, throwing a bucket of rubber chickens out the window and yelling &quot;Die Hitler!&quot;.
Had to have been a Pats fan. lol - peytonsurdaddy</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:26:07 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>OK, I get it.</title>
			<link>http://18to88.com/2009-archives/august/dont-forget-tony.html#comment-453</link>
			<description>But remember, I didn't even know this blog existed until the middle of last season. I didn't start really commenting on 18to88 until the end of last season. I haven't seen any of your really bad stuff. I guess it's for the better that I don't - Cass</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:24:49 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://18to88.com/2009-archives/august/dont-forget-tony.html#comment-452</link>
			<description>yeah, but some of that was in private emails.  

Big difference.  

 - DZ</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:56:05 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>I suppose</title>
			<link>http://18to88.com/2009-archives/august/dont-forget-tony.html#comment-449</link>
			<description>You'd have to go waaaay back to the old blog when a) I was juiced out of my mind b) The Pats had just lost the SB and c) I HATED Ashy-Larry Tony Dungy and his preachy fucking bullshit.

'C' still applies.

I won't reiterate anything I said then but some of it was pretty nasty. - J.C.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:47:00 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Please educate me.</title>
			<link>http://18to88.com/2009-archives/august/dont-forget-tony.html#comment-448</link>
			<description>What have you written that is more disgusting than NPM's racist crap? - Cass</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:43:33 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cass</title>
			<link>http://18to88.com/2009-archives/august/dont-forget-tony.html#comment-447</link>
			<description>If that was the most random and disgusting thing you've ever seen, you're a pretty big pussy.

I mean....c'mon - I've written worse things than that.

The difference is....my s h i t   is funny. - J.C.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:38:59 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wow.</title>
			<link>http://18to88.com/2009-archives/august/dont-forget-tony.html#comment-446</link>
			<description>I don't believe I've ever seen something as random and disgusting as that comment from NPM. - Cass</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:33:27 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>@stanb</title>
			<link>http://18to88.com/2009-archives/august/dont-forget-tony.html#comment-445</link>
			<description>Cover 1? I don't think so. When do we ever play man coverage? Like 5 percent of the time, and only when we are playing Baltimore? :)

It is definitely cover 3, if it needs to be defined at all. The corners drop deep and Bethea covers the deep middle, or some variation of that (Brackett can cover the deep middle on a cloud coverage). Sanders will usually cover the flat if it's a pass play. We've seen him break up a couple of hook routes on the outside from this coverage. Think AFC championship against the Pats when they needed a 3rd down conversion to ice the game. That was a zone play. Why else would he run to the flat? Contrary to popular belief, it wasn't his anticipation of the pass. It was his assignment. If it was man coverage, he wouldn't have gone out there. Also, he is always outside the linebackers when he comes down. If it were man, he'd be manned up on somebody or blitzing. - Guy</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:08:24 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>not cover 3</title>
			<link>http://18to88.com/2009-archives/august/dont-forget-tony.html#comment-444</link>
			<description>When Sanders comes down into the box, the Colts are more likely to be in cover 1 with Sanders playing a robber.  With Sanders robbing the short or intermediate middle, it's certainly not a standard cover 3 (although the corners can bail to deep third.  In that case, Sanders as a robber is more of a run stopper and the LBs end up in more of a matchup similar to what they do in a 2 man-under coverage.

Sometimes Sanders isn't robbing the middle, but is actually coming down to take the RB man to man.  If run, he's already coming.  If pass, he's got the RB in coverage if he releases. - stanb</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:52:42 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://18to88.com/2009-archives/august/dont-forget-tony.html#comment-443</link>
			<description>Wow, all I can say about that one was.

[img]http://blog.infinitemonkeysblog.com/files/images/obvious_troll.preview.jpg[/img] - shake n bake</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:43:39 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://18to88.com/2009-archives/august/dont-forget-tony.html#comment-442</link>
			<description>Yikes. I don't often get surprised by what I read in the comments section. That was surprising. - Guy</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:20:00 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://18to88.com/2009-archives/august/dont-forget-tony.html#comment-441</link>
			<description>NPM has been banned.  

We tolerate a lot.  It takes a lot to boot someone.

That did it.   - DZ</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:05:47 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Whoa!</title>
			<link>http://18to88.com/2009-archives/august/dont-forget-tony.html#comment-440</link>
			<description>It's about time we get some vigilantes over here.

NPM - his real name is Nate and he's a witch doctor in Argentina.

He spends his off time writing novels and finding ways to take shots at the Patriots. - J.C.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:59:32 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Shut the **** up</title>
			<link>http://18to88.com/2009-archives/august/dont-forget-tony.html#comment-438</link>
			<description>Wow, I didn't know niggers could learn to read and write.  

Nice name, Deshawn.  Is that your African name?  Or is it just Shawn with De added to it, so it sounds cool to negros? - NPM</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:54:13 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Same Pedigree</title>
			<link>http://18to88.com/2009-archives/august/dont-forget-tony.html#comment-437</link>
			<description>I find it difficult to believe that people would scapegoat Dungy in Indy like they did in Tampa Bay.  Two different situations.  First of all, Gruden and Dungy were two completely different coaches.  Gruden also hadn't been with the team as an assistant for a number of years.  Caldwell has been with the Colts for years and is a direct descendant of the Dungy coaching tree. There are some tweaks, but no dramatic difference (like Coyer's Colts &quot;D&quot;).  Secondly, the Colts have already won a Super Bowl under Dungy, whereas the Bucs had not, so it would be difficult to blame Dungy for a lack of success when he's the exact reason we won a championship.  In hindsight now I think Bucs fans think Gruden's SB win was actually Tony's team (especially given the few years following that championship under Gruden).  If Caldwell wins one I think Colts fans will give him his due credit, but we'll all also credit Tony because in many respects this is still his team. - NormFThomas</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:30:36 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>@DZ</title>
			<link>http://18to88.com/2009-archives/august/dont-forget-tony.html#comment-435</link>
			<description>That was my way of saying that I agree with you. Sanders will not get cut and Dungy is an HOF-worthy coach. Anybody who says otherwise is missing some very obvious information.  - Guy</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:40:38 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Derek, you have coaches mixed up</title>
			<link>http://18to88.com/2009-archives/august/dont-forget-tony.html#comment-434</link>
			<description>Flores was the coach who won two super bowls with the Raiders. That is another story.

Seifert should absolutely get a HOF nod.

Back to Caldwell, I think he'll be given alot more credit than Switzer or even Seifert. Mainly because of the media's perception that Dungy is not a great postseason coach, Caldwell may actually get extra credit if they win the super bowl. - dmstorm22</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:41:04 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ahhh, Mike Curtis</title>
			<link>http://18to88.com/2009-archives/august/dont-forget-tony.html#comment-433</link>
			<description>Could well be the reason the Mike LB position is called that. He's not, but he defined the position in my mind as an impressionable youth. Plus he flat-out nailed a fan who ran onto the field mid-game with great glee.  

Hey everybody, party at Bob's house. Edge just signed with the Seahawks. Now I have to somehow get down to the field level before a game with my son's old 32 jersey for him to sign. Doubt i can buy a new one... Problem is, the 6 year-old wore it to tatters and outgrew it, but now the 4 year-old wears it.  The numbers are all jagged-edged.  Maybe Edge would sign my Addai jersey--that'd be weird but I am sure he's laugh and smile at it.  
Bigger problem--my sister-in-law has season tix but I do not. I might convince her to get the jersey signed if I watch her kids that day.  Or gargle Drano.  Decisions, decisions.... - Bob M</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:10:22 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://18to88.com/2009-archives/august/dont-forget-tony.html#comment-432</link>
			<description>As far as the tactics thing with Jaguars...

Who got the game ball from the 2003 AFC championship game for the Pats?

A former Colt that mimed PM for the NE defense.  I believe that was Mr. Huard.  Check back on it..  If it wasn't the game ball, it was at least public recognition by the coach in the locker room.  Maybe the game ball went to the refs...... - Derek</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:58:16 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>HoF is a popularity contest</title>
			<link>http://18to88.com/2009-archives/august/dont-forget-tony.html#comment-431</link>
			<description>Seifert isn't in the HoF because it is (partially) a popularity contest.  He won 2 SB's but so did the coach of the Raiders in the 80s and he isn't ever even mentioned.
Let's talk about Mike Curtis for a minute as well... Why isn't he in the HoF?  Lots of inconsistencies happen when it comes to that.  Even people that have a vote for the HoF have no brain sometimes.  Peter King seems to hate Marvin, but he should definately be a 1st ballot.

As far as Dungy and Caldwell, IF the Colts win the SB (and I hope they will, every year) then it will probably look more like a Jim Johnson/Barry Switzer situation.  The misconception will be &quot;Great coach and great team...replace coach and surely it can be done by anyone of the same cut that doesn't change too much.&quot;  It is all just BS.  Even Tony Dungy said that he doesn't deserve the credit heaped on him from the TB SB win.  

Why do people argue about this crap still? - Derek</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:55:50 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
